Please Spread The Word!
And if you like this book, please purchase it in paperback
Click Here for a copy of the next book in the trilogy ‘We Are Awakening’
Click Here for ‘We Come Back’ and explore the last in the series ‘Light Is…’.
Please Spread The Word!
And if you like this book, please purchase it in paperback
Click Here for a copy of the next book in the trilogy ‘We Are Awakening’
Click Here for ‘We Come Back’ and explore the last in the series ‘Light Is…’.
What is the concept of religion? Or more importantly, why is it?
Religion has become an all-encompassing system that functions in all essence like a corporation. The Vatican, for example, is an arms stockholder and a bank with great influence in the corporate community. Our modern representation religion has strayed far from its intended purpose…It no longer serves as a voice of reason or compassion, but detachment from the people that it serves. Corruption in any institution can only take hold, if organised elements within it act on delusional beliefs that do not benefit the greater whole. Although many religious scriptures are hardly embodiments of peace or provide more than a handful of useful principles, not all of them have been edited, suppressed or destroyed. Some still offer guidance toward understanding a higher power…an essence that existed prior to this multi-verse.
Why do all the feminists and anti-feminists either fall silent on the migrant crisis or embrace economic migrants without consideration of the tangible consequences. Is it hateful to close your door to an extortionist, sex offender and/or religious fanatic? No, it is common sense.
It has been a well known fact for many years that we live in a rape culture. However, the migrant crisis has changed the situation to our disadvantage. It has highlighted how exposed women are to sexual misconduct on a daily basis.
What happens when an invading force with an obvious gender bias and known history of genocide expands their territories? History repeats itself. After the war-crimes committed on every single minority known to mankind, white genocide was only a matter of time. That notwithstanding, this article not about our karma. Every culture is at risk. Our very heritage is threatened with extinction from three sides.
Jihad: Despite the endearing efforts of the West to keep the peace by opening their doors and their hearts to the migrant population, no country can sustain the vast numbers that are currently residing and/or successfully head for Europe. Only a small number of families manage to escape for a better life… The large majority of the migrants are single, young men between the ages of 18-25. An army that propagates faster than any other since contraception according to Sharia Law is punishable by death, one might say.
Elite: War of any kind means good business and hefty profits for ‘someone’, particularly if they sell to both sides and purchase the real estate after a bloodbath. However, at least when the cogs of war are manipulated in such a fashion, one may almost have a fighting chance. What we are currently facing is an army, while knife and gun bans are enforced on a trial or permanent basis. The deck is visibly stacked against our favour at each and every turn.
Nature: The Sixth Mass Extinction is creating severe resource shortage. However, our damaging resource production and its unequal distribution is only one factor contributing to civilisation collapse. Temperature fluctuations, natural disasters and so forth.
Throughout recorded history, entire countries have faced shortages of women, which often led them to seek opportunities elsewhere. At times, women were permitted to choose, such as with the Spartans. On other occasions, women were simply raped and forced to breed in captivity. This commonly occurred, when there were underlying reasons behind the before-mentioned lack of women: (1) rare gender-focused disease that ravaged the region (2) preference of boys over girls, hence female offsprings often met a premature death (3) violence & genocide
For example, before Siciliy was invaded, they were a fair-haired and fair-skinned people. After countless women were raped and impregnated, following the invasion, fair-skin, dark hair and blue eyes became a prominent genetic trait from that region. Just like the Spanish exterminated the Tainos, raping the black and Indian women, creating Latinos.
The history of violence against women is a long one, yet there is only one course of events that keeps repeating itself over and over again. Each time, countries under Islamic Law face a massive shortage of women, as a result of executing their own before they have children, they are forced to expand their territories. It should be noted a significant portion of women are killed before they even reach the end of puberty.
“In politics, if something doesn’t go the way you want, shoot someone. It works every time. Just like it did with the London Riots…Just like it’s working now. As long as there’s a patsy, no one cares who’s actually behind it all.”
Our dreams for the future should not be of greatness or wealth, but freedom: the ability to think, speak and act freely, as women…This is a free world, risen from the ashes of oppression, but we are a prisoner of our bodies and our gender-roles. We should not have to justify our actions to anyone but ourselves. Ultimately, it is us who has to live with the moral consequences. If we wish to devote our lives to a higher cause, such as the search for meaning, we should not do so because a deity demands it. We should only do so, when it is what our heart, mind and spirit asks of us. Anything else is not selfless devotion to a higher being. It is lip-service, self-deception or conformity to something we have never striven to understand. Faith should not be taken lightly, it is very personal business to all of us. Particularly, for those willing to sacrifice their lives in the fight for religious domination or freedom.
Hope For The Best, Expect The Worst
The prophet Mohammed rode into battle alongside his female lieutenant, whereas the present-day interpretation of Islam has made women prisoners in their own homes. It has made them tools of self-gratification for men from the moment they can crawl. It is not only despicable, it is highly dangerous, as to the mental health of their victims. They are creating ticking time-bombs in charge of raising future generations, which can only result in hich rates of violent crime and suicide.
Generation after generation has been subjected to psychological torment and has been beaten into sexual submission, as a blatant abuse of the religious authority of the state. In such a country, where there is no protection for women, their offsprings can never be of optimal psychological health, regardless of the gender. They are raised with extreme forms of Stockholm syndrome, after being beaten, sexually abused and coerced into religious worship. Every inch of their identity is stripped from them…Every basic requirement from the food they eat, the clothes they wear to what they say is controlled by the men in their lives. Now, is that a life, in which any of us can ever be at peace with the world or ourselves?
Sharia Defies Human Rights
Women have it hard enough in the West without the inference of religious laws being thrust upon those that are enslaved and oppressed by them. No country should be governed by laws that advocate gender biases, it only festers corruption and inequality. For those few women that survive, cold indifference becomes a state of being. Some ex-Muslims that I have spoken to live in fear of Islam. As apostates, Sharia laws means condemning them to death. It seems that men, women and children are becoming slightly more afraid with each day that Islamic Laws will create an Islamic State, where no justice can prevail.
There is a difference between being ‘islamophobic’ and being weary of the surge of migrants that are taking a hold of the West, so Educate Yourself. Do not believe what you read in the Newspaper, unless you can be 100% certain that is is not propaganda. Know your cultural history, read more books, trust your gut and see for yourself what is happening in your community.
Organised Religion has no room in state politics or in the administration of the law. Particularly, when it defies human rights and common sense. Since the abolishment of capital punishment, what use is there for religion in the court-room? Prayer cannot change the verdict of a judge. It cannot protect the guilty or shield the innocent, as much as sending a thought into the universe can alter the course of cause and effect. It is unethical to demand religious devotion and/or worship of a non-believer. We were all born with free will. We have the right to be free from religion. That does not mean we have to thrust our beliefs down everybody’s throats, but we can act in defence of our right to free expression.
In a world, where religious freedom is political and political expression is religious. It becomes obvious that they reversed the rules on us in an attempt to infiltrate. It’s psychological warfare 101 to turn the target nation in on itself to weaken its defences. Without the ability to defend itself, it is ready for the taking. (Particularly, if you’ve already taken the outer zones)
France: While the protests are still ongoing for at least the next month, the no-go zones appear to be expanding. Although the Erdogan, the Turkish PM, criticises the French for their way of handling the demonstrators, if the tables were turned, we would witness a press-blackout followed by a significant reduction in the population. Erdogan is demonstrating another tactic of political infiltration, using our own weapons religion, politics and law against us.
The only thing that can possibly win against this is war. The time when complete non-resistance or non-cooperation across Europe would have been effective has passed. Now, our options are limited by the number of people we can dedicate to the problem of violent crime in our streets. The more people support the political freedom of their country, the less violence will need to be applied to regain their policies and territories. The less people take action, the more brutal the measures have to be. When outnumbered against hordes of battle-trained war refugees with more reinforcements hiding in close proximity, the situation can become life-threatening in seconds.
Germany: With about 1.5M refugees, only about 446’000 have been granted asylum. Although the remainder have not left the country, Germany has not taken any action. With daily sexual assaults by 3-15+ economic migrants converging on a single woman, law enforcement is reluctant to pursue the matter for religious/political reasons. An asylum seeker does not commonly exhibit hostile tendencies or commit violent crimes in the country that has given him or her refuge. If their application is denied by the state, they may resort to petty theft to support themselves, but they do not rape and pillage whatever catches their attention at the time.
A good tactician plays with his target, as a cat would with a mouse. They feign weakness, in the form of poverty and immobility, until they suddenly pounce upon their target. Yet, economic migrants are not as skilled at covert warfare, which plays in our favour by altering us to the threat the moment it began. However, the instant Merkel announced her open-door policy, welcoming millions into the country, she opened the country to political invasion. Without the forced deportation of millions of economic migrants that have remained long after their legal right to stay expired, Germany will continue to suffer. As Merkel refuses to assist her people out a sense of false pride in her decision, she is a representative of the people…And in every country, people have the right to simply refuse public support. It is even our human right to refuse elected officials, if we feel our political freedoms are threatened or compromised. Merkel opened the front gates and invited in a Trojan horse that she is now refusing to acknowledge or even comment on. Her unwillingness to respond to negative feedback make her highly dangerous and perhaps unstable. Ironically, her decision has made Germany more powerful in the European Union, but it has sacrificed its people to achieve this and most likely the future of the EU.
Although only 250’000 people would be required to gather in Berlin to overwhelm authorities, there is consistent evidence that the retaliation against political resistance in the fight for political freedom would be more than just instantaneous.
Austria: An EU exit would be perhaps one of the most peaceful solutions. Having grown up in the area, we never needed border control, remember what that was like? When you could walk through the Alps without worrying about migrants, lurching in the bushes. Now, even locking the door or excellent security system cannot stop the high increase in burglaries, rapes and random violence. Only 50’000 protesters are required to overwhelm die Wiener Behörden in a unified movement for the rights of men and women alike to regain political control over their country.
Switzerland: In a recent attack in May 2016 at a Swiss border, caught on CCTV, a group of approx. 2″ migrants blocked the road. The car stopped, the driver and passenger exited vehicle and before they knew it another 15 migrants descended into them out of the woods nearby. When in doubt, always stay in your car, lock the doors and drive and dial the police, if necessary. In the footage, a car sped by and took some of the migrant off their feet (without visibly injuring any of them). However, the content quickly turns into a snuff film as they knock out the driver and group around the female passenger after giving her a bloody nose and take her trousers off…
Here’s what happened & what is yet to come:
As a female psychologist in a profession that’s pretty much a boys-club, I may be scarcely heard or acknowledged, but I’m afraid to say that I turn out to be right more often than I’m comfortable with. Some women enjoy the thrill of the “I told you so.”, I just find it adds animosity to an already tense, if not hostile situation. (Being right for women is like telling someone to move their shit on the stairs, before they stumble over it. Nobody cares when you say it but you can be guaranteed that there’s going to be a crash, bang and wallop in the near future)
Hinduism: 400 million Hindus were slain during Muslim invasion and occupation of India. Survivors were enslaved and impregnated or castrated. India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500’s, the Hindu population had been reduced to approx. 200 million. (The conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. “Hindu slaughter.”)
Mass Rapes: In April 2016, a group of male refugees, heading for Europe accidentally wound up across the border of Russia. They 40-50 of them charged into a night-club and began to seize the female staff and guests for their own twisted pleasure. Although it did not take long until Russian law enforcement intervened and administered their own brand of justice.
Public Beheadings: As tensions increase, they will undoubtedly attempt to make an example of public and/or religious figures. Lyle Zimmermann fell victim to this fear-tactic, when he was attacked a tube-station and almost publicly beheaded. This is just another example of how the verse of the sword is misused to target any religious organisation that they cannot infiltrate. This commonly accomplished by spreading fear and ridding them of their most beloved members.
HIV & Other STD’s: The surge of migrants and continued number of sexual assaults is likely to propagate many incurable sexually-transmitted conditions. Most commonly reported conditions reported in survivors are HIV and Hepatitis. Considering this inconceivable fate, survivors would be at a higher risk of suicide. Victim support in these cases is essential, but often neglected, but there is much that we can all do to provide a safe place for them to begin the healing process. (Although there’s nothing that can’t be treated with a bi-annual dose of 9-Liquid Ounces of cannabis in a country, where it is legal, these strands are most likely more invasive, but still originate from the same man-made strain. To flush and restart the system would necessitate an additional 1-2 liquid ounces per month. It is recommended to abstain from alcohol, tobacco and processed food in-between treatment, but pure blunts or hemp & cannabis joints have shown to aid recovery. It should be noted that every liquid ounce is comparably three times more than a solid ounce of freshly grown medicinal cannabis, so don’t underestimate the amount required for this endeavour. In this case, better too much than too little and sooner rather than later.)
Religious & Political Warfare: Over the previous centuries, Islam has destroyed a great deal of spiritual, academic culture. Entire Buddhist and Hindu temples that have existed since before the birth of Christ were eradicated or burnt to a cinder. From a Western perspective, there is no amount of resistance from a single individual that can combat the birth-rate of the migrant population. One against 50 only works, when you have an uzi with unlimited ammunition, a suicide-vest or (if you’re a woman) a cyanide pill. (Especially now since every good muslim should have at least 4 kids) Only political resistance from small groups or large crowds, which invariably devolve into violence, would make an impact.
Political Infiltration: All migrants require is humanitarian tolerance in a host country, and the political freedom of women is directly threatened. Women are snatched off the streets, impregnated and detained in no-go zones against their will. We often speak of racial bias but we only criticise and improve our own conduct. While their blatant disregard of the Western cultures as well as laws grows disguised as religion, we are too busy arguing over the finer points of morality. Our judicial systems are morally superior through the sheer fact that we do not prohibit women from leaving their homes unaccompanied. We do not allow child marriages and yet migrants are abducting more children from playgrounds. If they disappear, we cannot judge their ‘way of life’, which is inherently detrimental to women. The mere existence of Sharia Law in this world is a hate-crime against women. Dare I say, the mere existence of Islam, for their punishment of apostasy with death, is a crime against humanity and every freedom we hold dear.
Mosques Everywhere: A success for Islam would be to establish a mosque at every single street-corner in every single country. Countries, which embrace Islam, must allow Sharia law. By doing so, they weaken their stance on human rights, opening themselves even further to the possibility of being subjected to religious laws that did not originate from the country.
Mass Executions of Non-Believers: In Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, the United States and Europe, one does not need to look very far to see mass executions swept neatly under the carpet. A large amount of the no-go zones were acquired and expanded through harassment and violent crime. In London, Berlin, Sweden and Denmark, they are extending their grasp in the community by extorting shop-keepers. If they refuse to pay, they will vandalise the store and often grievously injure staff. These are all basic warfare tactics that mark the first stage of a religious and political invasion.
Brexit: Although this culture of violence has spread to the United Kingdom, it appears as if most of the illegal migrants that smuggled their way into England are too occupied by the EU referendum. Their vote and yours will determine, whether British culture will become history. Brexit would be only means to stop the inflow, while it is still manageable, but that does not end the economic warfare tactics of the EU. However, the more countries would leave the EU and cooperate to re-build than without a Brexit. It’ll take time to rebuild every fraction that the EU surgically sliced out of Britain, ranging from steel, the docks, import and export to the military. However, if the protests in France give the migrant population the advantage they seek, the entirety of Europe would feel the hostile presence that has taken ahold of their communities. As Hitler once said, all you need to do to control Europe is conquer France, yet England has always been the key piece. Without Britain, you have nothing, which explains the consistent surge of illegal migrants and repeated attempts to break through Calais. It is military strategy, rather than a benefit or healthcare scam. That and they are still trying to get back at us from last time, when they swore holy war against the British Empire (although most historians are asked by the EU to omit that part).
Point-Based Immigration: If the system survives the propaganda pumped out by mainstream media, and make it through to a trial run, it would certainly not collapse the global economy. Far from it, it would offer the British Isle the opportunity to re-build their infrastructure. To produce and manufacture, instead of import everything from EU. Especially since the product quality has been severely diminished, as the products are not able to face the harsh environmental conditions. For example, german-made propellers for wind-farms are not capable of withstanding a certain speed of winds, hence they continually break down due lower wind threshold. In simple terms, they overheat quickly and break due to deliberately poor craftsmanship. (This costs the taxpayer thousands every single time that maintenance is required. For a fraudulent scam, they’ve amassed vast sums from only that one product. One shudders to crunch the numbers of all EU-products with high incident report rates) However, much it has been requested by the public to switch back to British models, this issue could no longer be ignored after an EU exit. Other countries would benefit from the economic growth of Britain, as they have many times before. The world is only as strong as its weakest, most exploited countries. Although not as exploited as some countries, the EU is still attempting strategically crush Britain beyond the point of return.
Civil War: Brutality is the only means to justice in a society, in which there is no judicial system outside of religious law. A system, in which the people do not serve to protect each other…In which freedom of expression and sacredness of life are a faint memory of the past. With the press-blackouts, police orders to keep the migrant crisis quiet, repeated assaults and foiled terrorist attempts, it is only a matter of time, until the people do what they are good at…Fight for the most basic rights of all living beings. To protect themselves and the rights of women in future generations.
These times remind me of the reign of Cesar. As a form of entertainment for the masses, hordes of Caucasian slaves were led into the arena to face hordes of Middle-Eastern slaves. Only this time, for the entertainment of the elite, hordes of Middle-Eastern migrants surge to every corner of the globe. While we are on the brink of mass extinction, depopulation measures are still in full swing, as evident by the increase in fatalities as a result of disease, violent crime and protests across the world.
A child is reported missing every three minutes within the United Kingdom. Yet, how many are recovered? Truth be told, not enough. How often do you open up a newspaper in the morning only to discover a three year olds dismembered body was discovered, allowing for the authorities to uncover hundreds more mutilated, tortured and sexually abused remains of little children? Hardly ever. Such press would often encourage the overall support and demand of action from the public to their government. Although one can easily arrive at the enquiry, how can individuals governing religion, countries or the economy evade the law for such extended periods in time without
inside cooperation? The probability is highly unlikely, yet not impossible.
450 individuals made formal complaints about Saville, involving 28 police locations throughout the country and among them are 34 alleged rapes. They spanned a period of 54 years between 1955 and 2009 when Savile was 82. The abuses were 23 children and young people on BBC premises and at 14 hospitals and at least one hospice. More than 70% of his victims were under 18 and one as young as eight. Yet, only after his death was the information published on a global scale.
In fact, on average 12,175 children, ranging from 0 – 19 years of age, die each year in the United States from an unintentional injury. Males had higher injury death rates in this particular study than females. The death rate for males was almost two times the amount than females. Also, males had a higher injury death rate in comparison to females in all childhood age groups. Injuries due to transportation were the leading cause of death for children. The highest death rates were among occupants of motor vehicles in traffic. There were also a substantial number of pedestrian and pedal cyclist deaths among children. Combining all unintentional injury deaths among those between 0 – 19 years of age, motor vehicle traffic–related deaths were the leading cause. The leading causes of injury death differed by age group.
For children less than 1 year of age, two–thirds of injury deaths were due to suffocation. Drowning was the leading cause injury death for those 1 to 4 years of age. For children 5 to 19 years of age, the most injury deaths were due to being an occupant in a motor vehicle traffic crash.
Risk for injury death varied by race. Injury death rates were highest for American Indian and Alaska Natives and were lowest for Asian or Pacific Islanders. Overall death rates for whites and African–Americans were approximately the same. Injury death rates varied by state depending upon the cause of death. Overall, states with the lowest injury death rates were in the northeast. Fire and burn death rates were highest in some of the southern states. Death rates from transportation–related injuries were highest in some southern states and some states of the upper plains, while lowest rates occurred in states in the northeast region. For injury causes with an overall low burden, death rates greatly varied by age. The poisoning death rate for those older than 15 years of age was at least five times the rates of the younger age groups, and the suffocation death rate for infants was over 16 times the rates for all older age groups. An estimated 9.2 million children annually suffer “unintentional injuries” resulting in medical treatment. Males generally had higher nonfatal injury rates than females. Injuries due to falls were the leading cause of nonfatal injury. Each year, approximately 2.8 million children had an initial emergency department visit for injuries from a fall. For children less than 1 year of age, falls accounted for over 50% of nonfatal injuries. The majority of nonfatal injuries are from five causes. Falls was the leading cause of nonfatal injury for all age groups less than 15. For children ages 0 to 9, the next two leading causes were being stuck by or against an object and animal bites or insect stings. For children 10 to 14 years of age, the next leading causes were being struck by or against an object and overexertion. For children 15 to 19 years of age, the three leading causes of nonfatal injuries were being struck by or against an object, falls, and motor vehicle occupant injuries. Nonfatal injury rates varied by age group. Nonfatal suffocation rates were highest for those less than 1 year of age. Rates for fires or burns, and drowning were highest for children 4 years and younger. Children 1 to 4 years of age had the highest rates of nonfatal falls and poisoning. Injury rates related to motor vehicles was highest in children 15 to 19 years of age.
The prevalence of child sexual abuse is difficult to determine as it is often not reported. Professionals agree that the incidence is far greater than that which is reported to authorities. Child sexual abuse is also not uniformly defined, therefore statistics frequently vary. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Children’s Bureau report Child Maltreatment 2010 discovered that at least 9.2% of victimized children were sexually assaulted.
Studies by David Finkelhor, Director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center, showed that 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse. Self-report studies show that 20% of adult females and 5-10% of adult males recall a childhood sexual assault or sexual abuse incident. During a one-year period in the U.S., 16% of youth ages 14 to 17 had been sexually victimized. Over the course of their lifetime, 28% of U.S. youth ages 14 to 17 had been sexually victimized. Children are most vulnerable to CSA between the ages of 7 and 13. According to a 2003 National Institute of Justice report, 3 out of 4 adolescents who have been sexually assaulted were victimized by someone they knew well (page 5). A Bureau of Justice Statistics report shows 1.6 % (sixteen out of one thousand) of children between the ages of 12-17 were victims of rape/sexual assault (page 18). A study conducted in 1986 found that 63% of women who had suffered sexual abuse by a family member also reported a rape or attempted rape after the age of 14. Recent studies in 2000, 2002, and 2005 have all concluded similar results. Children that had an experience of rape or attempted rape in their adolescent years were 13.7 times more likely to experience rape or attempted rape in their first year of college. A child, who is the victim of prolonged sexual abuse usually develops low self-esteem, a feeling of worthlessness and an abnormal or distorted view of sex. The child may become withdrawn, mistrustful of adults, and can become suicidal. Children that do not live with both parents as well as children living in homes marked by parental discord, divorce, or domestic violence, have a higher risk of being sexually abused.
Paedophilia Within Religion
According to an article within the Telegraph, the Church of England has been warned it cannot carry out a risk assessment of suspected paedophile priests in case it breaches their human rights. The warning arrived as the members of the General Synod voted to issue an unreserved expression of regret for the Anglican authorities’ failure to prevent sexual abuse in the past or even to listen to the victims accusations. Members of the Synod also supported a string of proposals designed to further expand child protection arrangements. In a joint statement, supported unanimously, the Archbishops of Canterbury and York stated: “The sexual and physical abuse that has been inflicted by these people on children, young people and adults is and will remain a deep source of grief and shame for years to come.” Although the Church’s legal officials admitted that privacy rules, enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, could make it difficult to force “credibly suspected” paedophile priests to attend a professional risk assessment. An earlier report, conducted in the wake of the child abuse scandals in the diocese of Chichester, recommended sending anyone reasonably suspected of abuse to visit professionals. Yet, a briefing paper prepared by the legal office warns that this would involve “intrusive inquiries” and would be in contradiction with Article Eight of the European Convention: The right to private and family life. Bishops would therefore be forced to compile a case against suspected priests in order to recommend them for a risk assessment. A proposal to ban priests from wearing dog collars if they have been suspended due to abuse suspicions has also caused complications after officials claimed that as the Church of England does not own the copyright to dog collars, it does not possess the right to ban their usage. “There is no distinctive uniform for Church of England clergy – a cleric in a black shirt and priest’s collar could be Anglican, Roman Catholic or Methodist, or belong to any number of small Catholic or Protestant sects that have no connection with the Church of England,” they stated. Earlier the Synod witnessed a frank admission that the Church has become so obsessed with sex that it was failing to tackle what is by far its biggest problem: the severe decline in congregations over several decades. In a paper presented to members, the Bishop of Sheffield, the Rt Rev Steven Croft, warned that discussion of how to attract individuals to church was often sidelined as issues such as gay marriage and the role of women had come to “dominate” bishops’ private meetings. Meanwhile, the Church’s man in Parliament, the Tory MP Sir Tony Baldry, warned that the Church of England faced virtual oblivion within 20 years unless it united. He told the Synod that “tribes” had been created by the “confused” debate about the role of women in the Church. He said: “To flourish in our mission to evangelise England we have to find a way of uniting.”
Cardinal Keith O’Brian blocked an independent inquiry into cases of historic sexual abuse that had support of every other bishop in Scotland. The retired Archbishop of Glasgow, Mario Conti, revealed that the Catholic Church in Scotland had planned to invite an independent academic to compile a report on each diocese’s “secret archives” and each bishop’s handling of allegations, which would then be publicised. However, Cardinal O’Brien, the president of the Bishops’ Conference, refused to co-operate and the planned inquiry was shelved, Archbishop Conti then composed a letter to be published in the Catholic newspaper the Tablet. Cardinal O’Brien was forced to resign in March after admitting “inappropriate behaviour” with priests and a seminarian, and is currently in an unknown monastery for a period of “prayer and penance” ordered by Pope Francis. In a letter defending the Catholic Church in Scotland’s handling of allegations of sexual abuse, Archbishop Conti wrote: “It was the intention of all but one member of the Bishops’ Conference to commission an independent examination of the historical cases we had on file in all of our respective dioceses and publish the results, but this was delayed by the objection of the then president of the conference; without full participation of all the dioceses the exercise would have been faulty.” A spokesman for the Church stated: “This refers to a decision taken in 2011 by the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland to commission an independent academic analysis of statistics relating to abuse and allegations of abuse over a 60-year period from 1952 to 2012.” “This project, with the cooperation of each of the eight dioceses in Scotland, started and ran until 2012, at which time, the then president of the conference, Cardinal Keith O’Brien, withdrew from the project. Without the participation of all the dioceses a ‘national audit’ was not possible so the analysis was stopped.” Cardinal O’Brien was president of the Bishops’ Conference from 2001 to 2012. A source close to the Church disclosed that Cardinal O’Brien could have feared that his own clandestine behaviour may have been revealed during the inquiry or that he was anxious to cover for individuals that were aware of his secret life. In the letter,to the Tablet Archbishop Conti said Cardinal O’Brien had stated: “I understand that in the light of the criticisms the Church has been facing, these audits will now be published. I think they will go some way towards confirming Bishop Joseph Devine of Motherwell remarks that the percentage of priests involved in abuse is ‘tiny’, and in demonstrating the seriousness and competence with which the Church in Scotland has been dealing with safeguarding in all its implications for many years.” The Catholic Church in Scotland has been scandalised in recent months by Cardinal O’Brien’s resignation and a recent BBC Scotland documentary detailing decades of sexual abuse at Fort Augustus boarding school in the Highlands, and its preparatory school, Carlekemp Priory near Edinburgh, run by Benedictine monks, both of which are now closed. Police Scotland said on Wednesday that more than 20 potential victims had already been identified. Child protection is due to be discussed by the Scottish bishops when they meet in the first week of September, although a national strategy is unlikely to be decided on until Monsignor Leo Cushley, the new Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh, takes over on 21 September and other bishops are appointed to existing vacancies. It is understood that the current president of the Bishops’ Conference, the Archbishop of Glasgow Philip Tartaglia, is cautious about backing an independent inquiry until all the vacancies in the conference are filled. However, there are growing demands for an independent inquiry into the Scottish Church’s handling of abuse allegations similar to one in England and Wales conducted by Lord Nolan in 2001. A second inquiry was led by Baroness Cumberlege in 2007. Last week, Danny Sullivan, the chairman of England and Wales’ safeguarding commission, stated there should be an independent inquiry in Scotland. And Alan Draper, a retired deputy director of social work that led the Catholic Church in Scotland’s initial response to child abuse allegations in the 1990s, stated an independent inquiry was the only way for the Church to act as it was now “totally discredited”, and any inquiry should also examine Cardinal O’Brien’s behaviour. Mr Draper concluded that while the allegations against the cardinal do not involve minors, he believes they come under the safeguarding category as those who alleged misconduct could be classed as vulnerable adults.
Elite Paedophilia and Child Abuse
The Telegraph published an article in September 2013, regarding the victims of the paedophile and MP Cyril Smith and are considering a lawsuit against the Liberal Democrats for compensation. Lawyers of the victims state that his position and status as a Liberal MP and “national figure” provided with him “access to vulnerable boys” and put him on the “pedestal of respectability”. They also stated that they are now investigating “who knew what” within the Liberal Party and its successor the Liberal Democrats.
Alan Collins, a solicitor at Panone, explained that “From the victims’ perspective Smith could not have sexually abused were it not for the fact that he was a councillor and MP. “These offices gave him access and opportunities, which would otherwise not have been available. “I am therefore investigating who knew exactly what about Smith at the time the victims were being abused. This entails an examination of his relationship not just with local government in Lancashire but that which he had with the Liberal Party and its successor the Liberal Democrats.”
With any relationship follows responsibilities. Smith misused those relationships to access vulnerable teenage boys and the Liberal Party benefited from the relationship with his larger than life profile, his campaigning, and numerous public appearances. “He took the Liberal whip and was very much a party man.” Lord Steel confirmed, the former leader of the Liberal Party. He had been made aware of allegations of “unusual behaviour with boys” involving Smith at a children’s home in the 1960s, before he became a Liberal MP. He was questioned about the allegations when they emerged in 1979, yet Smith denied any wrongdoing and informed them that matter had been investigated by police, who had closed their file. The police later confirmed that the case had been closed. On Smith’s death in 2010, senior Liberal Democrats including party leader Nick Clegg and former leader Charles Kennedy paid tributes to him as a “larger than life character.” A Liberal Democrat spokesman said: “Cyril Smith’s acts were vile and repugnant and we have nothing but sympathy for those whose lives he ruined. His actions were not known to or condoned by anyone in the Liberal Party or the Liberal Democrats.” It comes amid fresh evidence that MI5 and Special Branch covered up Smith’s abuse of children. A police dossier, which accuses the Liberal Democrat MP of a “sordid series of indecent episodes with young boys”, was handed to prosecutors in the 1970s “but went missing for more than 40 years.” The dossier which has since been obtained by Channel 4’s Dispatches, reveals that Smith was accused of eight counts of sex abuse, including six offences at a care home that he himself set up in Rochdale. Smith’s case has parallels with Jimmy Savile, the former BBC presenter that was one of many who used his celebrity status to gain access to vulnerable hospital patients. The Metropolitan Police confirmed that Smith was a visitor at the Elm Guest House, which was allegedly run as a male brothel in the early 1980s. Police are investigating claims that boys were abused at the premises by a paedophile ring. The existence of the Cyril Smith sex abuse dossier was first revealed by The Telegraph in November last year. Tony Robinson, a special branch officer with Lancashire Police in the 1970s, said he saw a police dossier which was “thick” with allegations from boys, claiming they had been abused by Sir Cyril. He stated that after taking the file out of the safe at special branch headquarters in Hutton, Preston, he was contacted by an officer from MI5 that informed him it required to be sent to London. Mr Robinson also disclosed that the then Director of Public Prosecutions had examined the allegations but decided they were “not in the public interest”. A former Lancashire police officer stated he was told by Special Branch to stop his investigation into Smith and ordered to hand over the police dossier. Jack Tasker stated: “They made it quite clear that anything that was kept by us would bring repercussions if we didn’t hand it over; that as far as we are concerned, the inquiry is finished … you will take no more inquiries into Cyril Smith.” In 1974 the Conservatives invited the Liberals to form a Coalition government in which Smith could have been appointed a minister.
It should be noted that MPs Care Group in Cumbria, Derbyshire, Durham, Lancashire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Tyrone, Ceredigion and so forth still provide long and short term care for vulnerable children of all kinds. Yet it does not stop there, I’m afraid.
A 2011 investigation reveal the Stoke Mandeville Hospital Trust, one of the most charities. Through their celebrity connections, the trust had raised phenomenal finances to support the treatment children with severe spinal injuries. As a kind of grateful gesture to those celebrities, the most formidable donors were often allowed to visit the wards without supervision, and spent time the children there, such as Jimmy Saville. In the 1970s, British TV presenter Jimmy Saville began volunteering at the trust. Unknown at the time was his inclination towards young children, particularly males. He applied his fame and knowledge to cover up hundreds, if not thousands, of assaults on children and more than likely acts of necrophilia. The hospital provided him with access to their wards. Access, which he allegedly used to conduct a campaign of abuse against children as young as the age of nine. It is presumed that the trust were aware of the circumstances and chose to turn a blind eye, possibly out of fear of losing their biggest donor. In 2013, the trust was shut down.
This merely evidences the power that the people that have upon the corruption within society.
For over a decade, the conflict in Darfur, a region in Sudan, one of the worst humanitarian crises. Thousands were displaced and children were sent to refugee camps, left to perish without parents or future. The French charity Zoe’s Ark travelled to a refugee camp in Chad with the plan of rescuing as many orphans as possible, providing them with loving French parents. “It was an idea with its heart firmly in the right place.” Unfortunately, the charity entirely disregarded Chad’s adoption laws, which considers exporting children from refugee camps without any government oversight illegal. It is questionable whether those 103 children they transported were in actuality orphans. A subsequent Red Cross investigation revealed that 85% of them were neither from Darfur nor refugees, but had been stolen from their parents in Chad. A practice that may be categorised as kidnapping. The charity was also discovered to have given the children “false injuries”. “Presumably on the assumption that refugees cannot be proper refugees without a missing eye.” For all their good intentions, the charity workers were arrested by authorities, and now stand accused of charges ranging from fraud to human trafficking.
Furthermore, Children in Need is one of Britain’s most respected charities, which is run by the BBC. It regularly donates millions of pounds toward aiding disabled children, young people, and psychopathic terrorists. Between 1999 and 2002, the charity regularly passed donations on to Leeds Community School, which in turn used the funding to establish an Islamic bookshop. This bookshop was owned and operated by the 7/7 London suicide bombers. With the donations from Children in Need along with those from other sources, the group funded the printing and distribution of terrorist and anti-Semitic literature, and scheduled local film screenings aimed at recruiting future jihadists. Donations from British citizens literally financed terrorism. In the aftermath of the London bombings, the connection was discovered, and the BBC issued a full apology.Children in Need has become officially associated with vacationing terrorists.
In 2006, after two years of a sustained drought Kenya had reached the brink of disaster. Crops failed, food shortages became fatally acute and over 4 million individuals were suffering from or facing the threat of starvation. In the face an impending humanitarian crisis, New Zealand manufacturer Christine Drummond decided to commit an act of kindness by offering dogfood to the families of Kenya. Expectedly, this is was interpreted as an offensive, if not racist, gesture. Even when starving to death, all of us would like to maintain a modicum of dignity. Feeding your infant dogfood would in most countries be considered a breach of human rights. The Kenyan press tore Drummond to shreds after an official declination. First, due to the nature of her offer. And second, for her determination to deliver to an area that was completely unaffected by drought. “Although Drummond later denied that the paste was actually dog food, claiming it was simply based on a near-identical formula, the damage had been done.”
One of the paradoxes of delivering humanitarian aid is that often one has to work with the very same individuals that are perpetrating the crimes the organisation is attempting to prevent. In Somalia, for example, charities require the support of the malitia to provide supplies for ordinary citizens, resulting in a loss of about 20% of all aid sent to the country in question. For agencies on the ground, it becomes a small price to offer help to those most deserving of it. However, according to respected Dutch journalist Linda Polman, this sort of unintended distribution may prolong wars. For instance, in Darfur, for over a decade a civil war involved a military regime committing brutal massacres against innocent civilians. Aid agencies desperate to enter the country and provide aid are forced to pay “taxes” to the regime, resulting in circumstances, in which the funding also facilitates the slaughter of the same individuals that they are attempting to support. These unintended consequences may be to perpetuate a disaster that would have otherwise burnt itself out in a shorter period of time.In 2010, a devastating earthquake leveled Haiti, taking the lives hundreds of thousands whilst reducing entire towns to rubble. Aid agencies and UN troops descended on the country to help with its reconstruction. The UN redeployed service members from other parts of the world, specifically from Nepal. And these arrived in Haiti with an accidental visitor. Cholera. Prior to the UN’s arrival, cholera had not been observed in Haiti for over a 100 years. Following their arrival, it tore through the country, killing 8,000 individuals, and infecting over 100,000. As a prominent microbial geneticist remarked at the time, introducing the bug to earthquake-affected Haiti was “like throwing a lighted match into a gasoline-filled room.” In a sort of mass panic, treatment centers were swamped with protesters, and lifesaving anti-cholera drugs were prevented from reaching infected areas. The organization denied responsibility, a claim that contrasts all scientific evidence.They also refused to provide financial compensation. The resulted in the Haiti government attempting to sue them in the international court.
Wyclef Jean’s Yele Haiti charity managed to raise $16 million in donations on the back of the tragic earthquake. Almost all of which went toward funding Wyclef instead of his former countrymen. Aside from supporting Wyclef’s family and non-existent companies, Yele repeatedly failed to deliver on contracted major construction and sanitation projects, including temporary homes and medical centres. The remnants of a cholera ravaged disaster zone remained, which was in desperate requirement of a medical treatment centre. In locations, where construction was initiated, it was often totally pointless. When the Global Orphan Project beat Yele to reconstructing a damaged orphanage, Yele promised to provide food instead. After a few months, it abruptly halted the food supply, and started building a new and totally unnecessary orphanage. The building was never finished, and the children nearly starved to death. In the New York Times, the orphanage director stated “If I had depended on Yele these kids would all be dead by now.”