The Bitter Truth of Leadership

At this time, we can switch on the television and witness thousands of lefties standing up for the rights of those that would exterminate them on the spot, given half a chance… They have chosen a higher path, yet most of them are unaware that this decision will seal their fate. They’d rather debase an honest discussion about their political views into name-calling instead of facing the fact that everything has pros and cons. We have opened the door to economic migrants that are simply out for what they can get with small numbers of actual refugees hiding amongst them (that are probably asking themselves whether the West has gone insane). The majority of economic migrants have no care or concern for the freedom of their host countries. This leads us to the question, why do we risk our basic human rights to protect them? Why are so many standard citizens infatuated with the idea of defending them? If the tables were turned, only for an instant, they would not reach out to save us. Truth be told, the only curtsey they would extend us is a swift execution.

To stand up for what is right has its risks, often it will be the last thing any of us will ever do in this life, but there are greater powers at play than the elite could ever fathom. Regardless how many more us will be buried, no one can successfully seize the freedom of another. The true essence of freedom is in every breath we take, it cannot cease even after we’ve drawn our last… It is infinite and absolute in all its manifestations. Nothing in all of existence can change that.

However, the illusion of control is a dangerous weapon to wield that can make anyone believe anything, given the right situation and application of pressure in all the right places. Our free will is bound by cause and effect, which means it is not free at all, until we make it so…until we realise that our will isn’t bound by circumstance, but by the motivations that drive our acroons, we shall never find freedom or peace. It is our choice to participate in this ongoing political charade or tear it all down.

We admire strength, boldness and power, so we seek those who possess it. We lavish wisdom, forethought and emotional freedom, so we strive to be near those who impart those qualities. However, to what end? Whoever becomes the centre of our focus invariably rubs off on us, but where that’ll lead is anyone’s guess. Too many falsely believe that sociopathy and psychopathy are inherited conditions… Contrary to popular belief, they are genetic as much as they are environmental. We model ourselves according to those around us by mimicking their behaviour. Nonetheless, whether we do so unconsciously or are consciously aware of this is another matter entirely.

Every leader attracts a different type of follower from the left or the right, from the lowest or the highest class… Every leader unwittingly attracts certain stereotypes that fuel their underlying agenda. For Merkel, these are the stereotypically short-sighted as well as those lacking peripheral vision in general. Very few decent, hard-working foreigners that emigrated to Germany, Austria, Switzerland and other EU member states are in support of her policies. The moment she opened her bosom to every young male from here to the Middle-East, one could see their eyes widen as they began to panic. Many escaped the situation in midst of the white flight shortly after. Not out of fear, but common sense. They, along with countless  natives, could sense that their time was running out fast. It is reminiscent of the complications that arise when a parent introduces a new sibling to the family… Those old enough to sustain themselves realise it is time to stand on their own two feet, whereas minors become acutely aware of how the power is shifting against their favour. Like Attracts Like. In the case of Merkel, the fiercer her followers become, the more unwilling they are to answer questions they don’t approve of. As she blatantly blanks the direct enquiries of her constituents with unrelated topics that make no logical sense, her supporters follow suit. It appears that the left across the entire world tore a page out of the Psychopaths Bible and did the exact opposite of what the instructions said… They do not offers answers, solutions or even consider the option of pretending to execute the will of the people. To the New Left, the people are a means to an end. They are irrelevant to the equation. They confidently act as if their rise to power is not in the hands of the people, but a small minority, controlling the majority from behind the scenes. This makes them feel as if it entitles them with the unquestionable right to belittle and devalue that which does not boost their appearance. When their stance is sensibly questioned without allowing them to evade those enquiries, they resort to offensive quips. They push them aside in a derogatory manner, while labelling those that asked them as racist. The mere fact we dare to question them is perceived as an insult, if not a direct threat. However, they don’t deal with threats like any sane individual, by taking them seriously… They ignore them, when they don’t dismiss them with the harshest words that spring to their minds at the time. Such behaviour has led many of their followers to believe, this is an acceptable way to behave. For Corbyn, this opened doors to reinforce an abhorrent, new standard in British politics. He was the first with the courage to openly ask what his party’s hearts desire. For approx. 15 minutes, he took the time to listen to what they want as well as expect from him. After he realised their views opposed his, he became the first leader to flee from the majority of his own party, and yet retain his position of leadership. The majority of Labour supporters are against immigration, not for the reason that they dislike other cultures, but because they are the cogwheels that keep this broken society running. The average, working-class person is the reason our society still functions. Granted, it barely works at the best of times, but it has not faced its inevitable collapse yet. When Labour abandoned the working class, which was no surprise, those cogwheels began to jar… Too many kept voting for them out of habit, blind faith and misplaced sympathy, not anymore. People do not like to be taken for granted, when it is them that has enabled Corbyns unfortunate rise to power. Unsurprisingly, Labours supporters are no longer white or British… They are not African-American, Asian or Indian any longer. They are no longer the party of the working-class, unless long-lasting unemployment and the unwillingness to seek paid work is categorised as the New Working Class. Moreover, their religious orientation, which was once a shining beacon of equality & diversity, has now become a party renowned for the coerced conformity of their supporters by the bleeding hearts of Britain. They may as well force their followers to convert openly instead of almost making them so do behind closed doors to prove their loyalties. In one way or another, they want to make you feel guilty/ashamed as to encourage self-loathing. Labour began to target the vulnerable and malleable members of society, whose minds are easily swayed by fear tactics. Not any kind of fear toward real-life threats, but the fear of being viewed as narrow-minded, bigoted or racist. This is basic psychological manipulation. What Corbyns upper-working/lower-middle class, left-wing supporters fail to understand is, when you have nothing for long enough, you lose all interest to maintain appearances. We don’t care how it looks. We care about what it is as well as what it will lead to. In life, nothing is ever as it seems…and we’ll do our best to never let anyone forget it. The actions of Corbyn have led a significant percentage of his followers to believe that his words serve a higher purpose than the complete religious and social indoctrination of the British people. He is the tool of the puppets that are strung along by the elite. He has lowered himself to such extreme degrees that they do not wish to be openly associated with him or scratch his back outside of dire necessity. In their minds, he lacks the intelligence and back-bone to be useful for any prolonged period of time. His control over the people is at best short-lived. As he envisions becoming Prime Minister of a non-country with the reigns firmly in his grasp, those behind the scenes laugh at his ignorance. (As much as he may be terribly oblivious of what normal people go through, no one deserves to be used only to be tossed aside like a children’s plaything.)

In addition, Corbyn deliberately disregards the historical fact that multiculturalism only works when both parties are willing to find a compromise they can live with. When multiculturalism becomes a matter of sacrificing your way of life to accommodate mass migration, it paves the way to genocide. Corbyns traitorous actions are causing direct physical, mental and emotional harm not only to the British people, but all people of all ethnicities. They are forcing decent people to hide or flee the United Kingdom, while they put genuine refugees at risk. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that his left-wing followers act in accordance with his radical views, enforcing them at every opportunity. This can solely lead to civil war, which will most likely take the form of an uprising of the right against the left, when there are obviously more pressing matters at hand. While we will waste more time quarrelling over schematics, our mutual enemies channel their energies more productively. They are breeding for war under the guise of Sharia Law. They do not require the consent of their women, when it is the sole purpose of their existence to serve them, otherwise they will attempt to terminate their existence and secure new breeding stock.

When Is It Rational To Fear Mass Migration?

Political correctness is neither honest nor kind. It is even unnecessary and heavily damaging in times, when the absolute is truth called for.

It is rational to be weary of mass migration

Logically thinking, it signals awareness that we do not produce a sufficient quantity of resources to feed, home and clothe our own, so how can we become an idyllic multi-cultural society that provides for everyone?

In recent history, each mass migration from the Middle-East has brought disease, violence and religious conflict. What evidence is there that supports it will be different this time? Apostates across the United Kingdom fear the return of the enforcement of Sharia Law on them. For genuine refugees from Middle-Eastern countries that have integrated in the Western world, mass migration is a sign of impending conflict and war. They fear that which they left behind is coming to get them, and with every denial that anything is wrong, we are showing them that their fears are justified.

When does mass migration become an invasion? Firstly, when they display hostile intent on entry (en masse). This is well illustrated by many border incidents, where individuals were holding signs saying “let us in or die.” Secondly, the fanatical obsessions of migrants in Calais to enter the United Kingdom (when they are already in safe territory) is a tactical manoeuvre that indicates they’re aiming to distribute themselves equally across Europe and maintain a solid presence in every country that is willing to grant them asylum. Thirdly, once a minority expands at such a fast rate that it will become a majority in its host country within a period of 5 years, then mass migration will alter the socio-cultural environment of said country beyond recognition.

We need freedom from the control system that has become religion, not more religious conflict, based on our unique interpretations of reality or our beliefs… Religion used to stand for the divine aspect of man. The fact that if we work hard enough, anything is possible. Religion used to be a science of our relationship with the cosmos, filled with meditation, deep contemplation and consciousness development that yielded great accomplishments, which we still rely upon. Now, religion has become a shadow of its former self. New great followings emerge that are led by the average person, inspired only by their deep faith. Economic migrants police the streets with Sharia, as we attempt to reinforce our Christian rule. With every day, the belief that a clash of cultures is inevitable spreads a little further. With each lie, with each broken promise and with each violent attack, we build more walls to fortify ourselves.

Unfortunately, Merkel opened Pandora’s box. She allowed the Trojan Horse to pass through the gates of Troy, accompanied by armed troops with hostile intent, slaughtering hundreds…Yet, she’s still throwing her entire body-weight into keeping those gates open. In the times of Ancient Greece, she would have been labelled a traitor for her humanitarian, if not self-destructive tendencies…but for what its worth, if Socrates was alive today, he would have been institutionalised as a schizophrenic with multiple personality disorder.

Back to the point, there are no more walls to be built that can protect us from this change. However, statistically, to embrace this level of socio-cultural change will invariably lead to the enforcement of Sharia Law on the major towns and cities in Britain, such as London, Brimingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Lincolnshire etc.
Conversely, if we do not accept their religious laws, religious conflict will be waged in an attempt to enforce their laws. Whichever path we choose from this point forward will incur more blood-shed.

When there is a need enforce foreign customs on others, mass migration becomes invasive.
When there is an agenda behind mass migration, mass migration becomes an invasion.

“Islamophobia?” F**ck Off

“Greed has poisoned men’s souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge has made us cynical. Our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost.” (Charlie Chaplin)

How do we measure loss? On average, we count the number of victims. However, when it comes to Sharia law, we can hardly ask how many women have been beaten, raped, tortured and/or stoned. Logically, a rough estimate falls into the millions, if not billions…And there is nothing we can do, or is there?

As a women, I can tell you that I am only one of many that will not condone the enforcement of sharia law on anyone. Men and women alike deserve better than to be raised with archaic religious laws that reinforce the freedom of one gender for the sake of power over its counterpart. Truly powerful men do not need enslave women, nor do they use religion or violence for personal gain.

That notwithstanding, the rape crises, which are running rampant in European countries, are the symptoms of a deeper ailment. An imbalance that has persisted for thousands of years. Although many have challenged it, we have not yet reached the point to overcome any form of inequality really. Whether it concerns wealth, race or gender. We may cling on to political correctness with our every breath, but we do not pursue it out of kindness or compassion…We do it because we are scared. We don’t want to be seen as racist, anti-social or apathetic.

Although we often shrug this fear off, calling it an evolutionary throw-back, it is inherently justified. Islam is known for its tactical invasions and endless thirst to take over. Every religion has the potential to cause harm…And it does so frequently. Peadophile priests, rabbis, gurus and imams are evidence of that. Fact is, for more than a handful of sexual predators, there is approx. one genuine follower. The only question is whether that makes the whole concept of religion worthwhile for us.
Religion has and will always be used for personal gain, so we have to respect when other do not want to engage in any form of religious worship, or even humour the concept of religion, for personal reasons. This is our life, we have the right to choose what to believe…If you don’t like it, f**ck off.

Personally, I don’t care whether you are black, white, purple or from Orion. You are so much more than your creed, colour and race. Underneath all that, you have the choice to be free…Free from religion, capitalism or mainstream opinion. You have the opportunity to be kind, rather than cruel, and there is no better way than by speaking up for the freedom of the men, women and children in your area!

Amongst all this fear-mongering, we are forgetting one very important thing: We only fear that which we do not understand. Before we can make an informed decision on Islam, we need to know what we’re talking about. We need to educate ourselves on its scriptures, history and how the verse of the sword was created. In other words, you are not islamophobic, if you understand the threat that Islam poses. It’s okay to be uncomfortable, because something is different. It’s not okay to support the religious practice of sexual slavery. Over one millions Muslims manage to practice their faith peacefully with respect for women. However, the foundation of Western civilisation may as well collapse, if we allow affiliated, invading religious groups that have no regard for any other minority, but their own. We have fought too hard for too long to be conned into surrendering our freedom to yet another religious iconography. Those that wish to be free from religion should be able to keep their right to say “No.” If we lose this basic right of free expression, then what are we? What will we become? How many more need to suffer and die, before we can unite as a people without killing each other over belief or restricting each other’s development?

In an islamic society, women do not have the choice to study, be independent or even walk down the road without a male to accompany them. Conversely, men can have their wives and children taken off of them, if it looks as if they cannot protect them… The equivalence of this is developing in all the countries that are accepting asylum seekers. Sharia Law is simply administered behind closed doors. We are in danger of reverting back to a time, where the man with the biggest stick won the woman, whether she wanted it or not. We are in danger of breaking up the family unit even further than we already have. Most importantly, we are risking a new version of the dark ages with every day that we value blind faith over common sense and human liberty.

The Power of the Anglosphere in Eurosceptical thought

 

 

 

 

The idea of the Anglosphere is an important element of British Euroscepticism. Ben Wellings and Helen Baxendale show that calls for unity of purpose between English-speaking peoples offer Eurosceptics an alternative political community to the European Union, and one that aligns history, culture and politics more closely than does Britain’s membership of the EU. Although the Anglosphere does not yet constitute a viable political alternative to Britain’s EU membership, articulating it helps Eurosceptics imagine a UK outside the European Union.

The rise in Euroscepticism within the Conservative Party after 2010 was preceded by a decade of discussion about the existence of the so-called ‘Anglosphere’ as a viable alternative to the UK’s membership of the European Union. Amidst all the searching for Swiss or Norwegian models for Britain’s relationship with the EU, some Eurosceptics advanced the Anglosphere in response to criticisms about the lack of an alternative vision to European integration.

Euroscepticism and the Anglosphere

Speaking in the debate on the Maastricht treaty in 1992, the Conservative Minister for Europe, Tristan Garel-Jones posed the question that always caused some awkward silences amongst British Eurosceptics: ‘Can the anti-federalists, the Euro-sceptics and little Englanders offer a positive alternative?’

Reflecting on this in The Spectator, Tim Congdon floated a response: the English-speaking peoples or what was increasingly being referred to as the ‘Anglosphere’. From the late 1990s, exponents of the ‘Anglosphere’ idea argued that the English-speaking nations are distinguished by a set of institutions and characteristics that the other advanced nations of Europe ultimately lack: a common law tradition, respect for private property, continuous representative government, and a culture that nurtures civil society and entrepreneurial enterprise.

Emerging in the late 1990s, the Anglosphere idea is, in essence, a proposal for an international organisation that accommodates and celebrates the history, culture and institutions that many hard Eurosceptics believe make Britain different from the continent. It is, in short, a mutual political association that variously includes the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, the English-speaking Caribbean islands and Singapore, all dedicated to free trade and greater military and security cooperation that could constitute, in Robert Conquest’s words, ‘a centre of hope in the world … around which peace, cooperation, and democracy can develop’.

The Anglosphere idea has proven attractive to prominent British Eurosceptics. Margaret Thatcher, David Willetts, John Redwood, Daniel Hannan, David Davis, Norman Lamont, Liam Fox, Bill Cash, Michael Howard, and William Rees-Mogg all wrote or spoke in support of increased cooperation across the Anglosphere, with their ideas often published or promoted in Conrad Black’s and Rupert Murdoch’s media outlets.

Britain, Europe and the English-speaking Peoples

Although sentimental ties to the Commonwealth and the wider English-speaking world never went away, the Commonwealth could not provide a viable alternative to Europe in the mid-1970s. But this context changed. As such, Eurosceptics in Britain have questioned Britain’s accession to the Common Market.

Writing from Melbourne in 2013, Boris Johnson spoke of the ‘historic and strategic decision that this country took in 1973’ in which ‘we betrayed our relationships with Commonwealth countries such as Australia and New Zealand’. This betrayal was the product of specific historical circumstances – domestic, European and global – that no longer pertained. Johnson argued that:

When Britain joined the Common Market, it was at a time when the establishment was defeatist, declinist and obsessed with the idea that we were being left out of the most powerful economic club in the world. In those days – when olive oil and garlic had barely appeared on the dining tables of Britain – it was assumed that in order to be “internationalist” it was enough to be European. Well, it is now perfectly obvious that that is no longer enough – and that we need to seek a wider destiny for our country.

The attraction of such arguments was that they appeared to make historic and cultural sense. The Anglosphere suggested that progress could be reconciled with the restitution of a historical wrong and a future for Britain outside the EU imagined amongst a community of English-speaking peoples sanctioned by the past relationships and shared culture. Thus a political choice that seemed expansive in 1973 was perceived as parochial forty years later.

A renewed emphasis on long-standing and stable (if somewhat taken-for-granted) political relations with Commonwealth countries chimed with calls for a political re-orientation away from Europe after 2010. For example, speaking in Sydney only days before David Cameron’s Bloomberg speech on the EU in London, William Hague argued for closer political cooperation between Britain and Australia, exemplified by the on-going ‘five eyes’ intelligence cooperation, the regular ministerial-level meetings inaugurated in 2006 under the name of AUKMIN and the diplomatic and consular cooperation in emerging countries that were already well established.

European Integration and the Anglo-British Past

The strong sense of British difference from the continent that animated many Eurosceptics and Anglosphere enthusiasts was firmly rooted in a particular understanding of Britain’s past, making the Anglosphere the other side of the Eurosceptic coin. John Redwood neatly encapsulated the centrality of this history to hard Eurosceptic thought:

Britain is at peace with its past in a way that many continental countries could never be… We do not have to live down the shame that many French people feel regarding the events of 1940-44. We do not have to live…with the collective guilt that Germany feels about the Holocaust… We do not wake up every morning like Italians to wonder who might be in government today and which government ministers might be charged with corruption tomorrow.

Such a rendering of the past is redolent of the dominant British historiography of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, which uncritically celebrated Britain’s constitutional and imperial achievements and the collective exceptionalism of the English-speaking peoples to be found in David Cameron’s ‘favourite book,’ Our Island Story, by Henrietta Marshall.

In this understanding of the past, the unique British inheritance that makes further integration into Europe undesirable to hard Eurosceptics is the very same inheritance that unites the Anglophone world, rendering deeper cooperation and closer association not only eminently possible but highly desirable. In this way, with the ‘Special Relationship’ at its core, the Anglosphere’s proponents contend it would constitute a more authentic and robust standard-bearer for Western values than a weak and crisis-ridden EU could ever hope to be.

Conclusion

Even advocates of the Anglosphere Association are happy for it to remain just an idea: a gratifyingly provocative retort to the likes of Tristan Garel Jones. An institutionalised Anglosphere Association is unlikely to be realised anytime soon. But the practicalities and prospects of the Anglosphere as a functional entity are not really the main point of interest here. Anglosphere enthusiasm is significant first and foremost for what it says about a certain strand of hard British Euroscepticism and its conception of Britain’s identity and place in the world.

Source: The power of the Anglosphere in Eurosceptical thought

Refugee Crisis in Britain

Since the moment humanity first looked up into the sky, dreaming of the return of the ancient Gods that once guided our spiritual evolution…We have grown fond our own religious freedom or lack thereof. It has become our right, as men, women and children, to worship however and whoever we choose as long as we do not inflict harm or aim to forcibly convert anyone.
In December 2015, the South East of Britain (along with countless other regions of Europe) began to feel the increased displacement of refugees from the Middle East. Although the euro-tunnel was guarded from both sides, lorries as well as ferries were searched, the influx of illegal refugees continued to grow and still is.

Around the the same time, a few blocks away from my street…Women were being held captive. Despite the fact that a substantial number of them had entered the UK legally, 99.9% of them were prohibited from learning the English language by their fathers, uncles, brothers or husbands, while being forced to fulfil their duties in a foreign country, gearing up for civil war.

One Saturday evening, I was heading to the nearest local store for some milk, as I heard loud voices echoing from a distance. Instead of making myself scarce, like I probably should have, my curiosity drove me to investigate what’s going on. It appeared that the man was speaking to his wife in his native tongue, as he held her by her upper arm with what seemed quite some force. Observing from afar, as he dragged her down the road. She did not struggle or make a sound.
Due to a change in Jobcentre regulations, asylum seekers were urged to learn the language or fail to qualify for Jobseeker’s Allowance or other social benefits. However, just because they have been taught when to speak and what to say, does not mean they actually understand what they are saying. The majority of the female asylum seekers in the United Kingdom to repeat a handful of words with very little accent, but push comes to shove…They have no idea what just came out of their mouth. When I put this little theory to a test (with the help of some dear friends of mine), I could have asked them anything, as long as it semi sounds like an average, innocent question that they are asked on a regular basis.
It has to be stressed that the majority of Islamic women are unaware that they have rights in the West. Particularly in the United Kingdom. Most of them are frightened beyond the point of trusting anyone. Furthermore, the enforcement of Sharia law on British soil means that if they were to leave their Muslim husbands, they are beaten, stoned or otherwise executed for their resistance or disobedience to Islam as a religious state. It is of no consequence that they are do not execute them in Britain. They are sentenced here, ultimately we are condoning their death. That is worse than returning capital punishment for serial murders or peadophiles.
Truth be told, many women all around the world need our help…However, to get involved means to become a target yourself. In countries, such as Britain, that means to break Sharia law to prohibit the continuance of oppression, brutality and sexual assault against women of any race, creed or religion. That being said, abuse and violence are not gender neutral. Sexual assault is an act of power and dominance that affects men, women and children alike.
Statistically, it is significant that since the refugee crisis targeted mass assaults have taken place across Europe. However, one of the largest attacks occurred in Russia. 51 assailants barged into a night club and initiated a mass sexual assaults that ended with 17 of them in hospital.
In Germany, a 13 year old was abducted and raped by multiple attackers for 30 hours, before being apprehended.
Fact is that bad things will always happen, but they’d happen less, if good people chose to risk their life and intervene. However, even that can go horribly wrong. As Henry Theaureau once stated “Do not simply be good…Be good for something.”, because what’s the point of being good, if we don’t do the best we can, when tragedy strikes. However, as long as we value our own lives more than those of others, we will never find peace. There is a vast difference between self-defence and unreasonable force. Not many have the courage or training to protect their attacker by holding them in a restraint…And when outnumbered ten to one, who would not feel desperate enough to make a move that might be lethal for the person on the other end.

The remainder of illegal immigrants, mainly single men, that have managed to smuggle themselves over the border travel the country along the train-tracks of lorries… Some even fashioned shelters out of sight, living almost entirely off the grid. As the railway is outside the jurisdiction of British Law Enforcement, it has its own private security personnel. Unsurprisingly, they emerge at social and unsocial hours to mingle with the locals. Whereas some have rather unsavoury motives, a small amount of refugees generally mean no harm or offence to anyone…They are intelligent enough to keep to themselves without drawing unnecessary attention in fear of deportation or religious persecution.
Amongst other things, swimming pools, clubs and other recreational facilities across England as well as Europe, have had to restrict their access to refugees. Hartsdown, for example, remained an active hunting-ground for several months, resulting in the sexual harassment and attempted assault of countless British women. On February, events escalated and an assault occurred across the street from my own home in the late afternoon around 15:30. Witness statements document that he approached her attempted to speak to her, but as soon as she told him to f*** off, he covered her mouth. Less than one minute later, over 10 people from the town centre came charging at him. Needless to say, they left him alive, but they weren’t intending to hand him over to the authorities. Although the temperatures dropped below freezing and the streets were almost deserted, the average British citizen saved the day by preventing a possible sexual assault or worse.
After speaking to several women that wished to stay anonymous, I discovered that quite a fair amount of violence has gone unreported. Similar incidences have occurred intermittently since December. None of them had used weapons or excessive force against the attackers. As long as no one is injured or harmed in the process, we all deserve to defend our life. When we are stripped of that most basic human right…All bets are off. Some may conform and let themselves become a victim by circumstance, but as a gentle warning, that has greater psychological repercussions than using reasonable force to restrain. Although thou shalt not murder…Nobody ever said anything about kneecapping, throat-punches or eye-scratching as a last resort, which was fairly common at the time of the Bible with less effective medical treatment options.
Ground-Rules: Don’t attempt to reason with your attacker. Don’t scream for help, unless you know for certain there are people nearby that will come to your assistance. More importantly, don’t ever step backwards! In combat, similar to war, you can only move forward. Moving backwards risks falling or other injuries, whereas the closer you get to your attacker the less likely they are able to strike with precision or strength. Also, if they wanna take you anywhere, even its just further down a dark alley…You’re better of fighting for your survival than to be escorted somewhere and done away with quietly after being gang-raped for several hours.

From professional experience, I can honestly tell you that the first few times in life-threatening situations, every survival instinct in your body contorts. No matter how much pain they may inflict, particularly if fear creeps in and paralyses you…You may be hesitant to defend yourself, but there is no shame in taking a stand. Women are not to be used or abused, we must hold our heads high and carry on with grace. For the sake of our offsprings and their future generations, we cannot let hatred or prejudice infect our society. No matter the colour, race or religion of the attacker, their actions are immoral and unjust and they cannot evade the consequences of their actions. None of us can.
In a compromised world, where justice is a hit or miss operation rather than a learning process…Free speech and the right to defend ourselves is the only means we have to prevent further corruption and injustice. Once we may no longer protect our lives and are actively targeted for speaking the truth, societal unrest and vigilante justice are only a matter of time. It is the last shred of freedom that we have left.

As the current social, economic and political tension is running high, as border control is tightened. The armed response against refugees attempting to cross the border illegally will continue to rack up the casualty count. Conversely, the islamic financial takeover of Britain is proceeding with little resistance. Residential areas across the United Kingdom are purchased building by building and converted. More and more time passes, as entire streets are becoming inaccessible for health and safety reasons. The homeless people in the South East of Kent have been displaced from their regular hideouts by illegal refugees. In more extreme cases, they engaged in fights over territory and some ended up in hospital. Amongst other things, the old post-office in Margate was broken into by several refugees. 250 illegal refugees were detained in one single area in Thanet are a thorough.

On a separate note, the media silence broke earlier this week, as partial information of several homicides was released. For many years, there have been approx. 1-2 murders in London, they are more often than not gang and organised crime-related offences. In Birmingham, the average homicide rate is 2.5 bodies a week. This week, on the other hand, London, Birmingham and Kent’s casualty list climbed beyond single digits.
Since the refugee crisis has tightened, events has escalated, yet are kept behind closed doors. Tensions are rising across Europe, not merely the United Kingdom. As the refugee numbers increase and the majority of males fail to integrate, civil disputes are becoming inevitable. Once racial or religious bias becomes a factor, it is only a matter of time before large numbers of people are injured, murdered or incarcerated. As this has led to the talk of an invasion as World War 3 with Islam, the heads of the Protestant, Roman-Catholic and Church of England’s have decided to let bygones be bygones… The increase of Muslims created unease, however, this is justified. As a woman, I would despise being stripped of my most basic rights.
From a historical perspective, the West has become “fairly tolerant” when it comes down to religious diversity and freedom of speech. Islam is obsessively focused on minority rights. Yet, in any country, where Islam has become a part of the majority…there are no minority rights. Conclusively, it is of great importance that we do not force our religions on them and that we do not allow them to force their religion upon us. We may be able to convince them to lead a live of non-violence in the West, otherwise a vicious cycle of deportation and a second or third attempts to return to England (which has actually happened) will occur on a more frequent basis. However, the global situation is expected to escalate during spring and summer.

The Truth About Immigration in the UK 2014